I have noticed a few articles as of late that have been written about this subject. One in particular proved quite interesting to me. Specifically I enjoyed “Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught” in an issue of Fortune Small Business Magazine. I won’t spoil the article for you because I think it is a valuable read, but in essence they have some extremely successful entrepreneurs state “made” or “born” with regard to how entrepreneurs come to be. After having thought about this topic in the past, reading about others thoughts on it and hearing the viewpoints of other entrepreneurs I am finally ready to stand my ground in this debate. Entrepreneurs are born and then they are made. I think the truly GREAT entrepreneurs are simply born – regardless of their circumstances they will be extremely successful. They don’t need to be made – circumstances matter little to the Steve Jobs of the world. However, the vast majority of entrepreneurs in this world aren’t going to be the great ones – how many Steve Jobs are reading this right now? I know one isn’t writing it.

Chances are, you or I will never read about or even hear about these types of business owners – even if they live in our same city. The woman who owns the small consulting firm downtown or the man that runs his own shoe store on the West side. These people are entrepreneurs on a smaller scale – they take risks, they make tough decisions that impact their personal salaries, they provide an income for others and they compete every day for a buck. Although on a much smaller scale, these entrepeneurs aren’t all that much different from Uber-Entrepreneurs Steve Jobs or Michael Dell with one critical exception. These entrepreneurs were likely born, but they weren’t made.

What I mean by this is they probably had some example of entrepreneurship growing up. Perhaps their parents owned a business or they worked for their Uncle in the Summer in his company XYZ. They watched, and learned and realized they wanted to try and do their own thing. This is where the differentiation occurs (in my mind anyway). These smaller entrepreneurs probably didn’t do anything about their desire at first – unless they inherited their business, which doesn’t really count – unless they take that business to the next level, but that is a whole new discussion. Anway, what likely happened is they went to school or got a job, or went to school and then got a job. Either way, they ended up working for someone else. This likely went on for years – working, saving money and dabbling in side businesses and deals. Then, one day, something happens. Perhaps they get fired, or they just get tired of answering to “the man”. Maybe they get enough money saved to satisfy their risk tolerance. This event, whatever it may be, triggers them to get into business for themselves and then they become entrepreneurs – probably for the rest of their lives. Remember, we are talking about people who actually are entrepreneurs, not those who try it and aren’t good at it – so let’s assume these folks have a solid career of business ownership and then retire as the sun sets……..quietly and with little fanfare.

The discussion on made vs. born does not end with the “everyday” entrepreneur. Most of the articles focus on the highly successful and likely well-known entrepreneurs. People are generally more interested in learning how they became so successful. They want to hear Mark Cuban’s story of Broadcast.com – not Harry Jones story about his car wash chain of 11 locations. It is human nature that we are more interested in Cuban then the Car Wash. We all want to know how Mark did it – was it because he was born to be an entrepreneur? Harry has achieved financial security with his car wash chain, but Mark is famous and has made enough money to buy an NBA basketball team! This is where my point hopefully connects the dots. Mark Cuban was born extremely intelligent. He clearly had a gift from Heavenly Father at birth that allowed him some fairly rare characteristics and more brain power then your average human being. Even still, there are a lot of Mark Cuban’s born every day, all around the world. So why did Mark become Mark – and not Harry? This is the crux of my argument.

Mark likely had some sort of an intellectual advantage at birth. But if you are Mark Cuban, I would submit that it doesn’t matter which circumstance you grow up in after your “born” characteristics are already in place. I am sure I can research and find 10 extremely successful, well-known, billionaire entrepreneurs that grew up in ten totally different environments and yet still made my list.  Nothing would stop them from becoming great entrepreneurs. Good parents or bad ones, lots of money or no money, going to school or dropping out, success the first time around or the fifth time around – none of it would matter to these ten entrepreneurs I would choose (and there are many groups of ten I am sure). That is because they are born to be great! They can screw it up thru a variety of bad personal decisions but if they don’t do anything too catostrophic to their lives, they are going to make it big. Mark Cuban would have been highly successful regardless of what happened to him between birth and his $5 billion dollar sellout to Yahoo (assuming he didn’t kill someone or his Mom didn’t beat him horribly).

Back to Harry, the car wash chain owner. Let’s put him in two totally different sets of circumstances in his formative years and early in his career. Let’s throw lots of money and education at him. Let’s give him great parents. Let’s say his first business is a big success. Harry is likely now the proud owner of 450 car washes. Harry was born with some innate entrepreneurial characteristics, but he was made into who we are interested in learning about – not born. To illustrate this point, let’s give Harry an entirely different set of circumstances. No money, bad parents, no education and his first shot at a business is a huge failure. Since Harry probably took a little time to start this business (per my point a few paragraphs earlier) and didn’t just jump right into things, I would bet this combination of negative factors would cause Harry to return to his job and forget about entrepreneurship, at least for awhile. Harry would in a sense, give up as an entrepreneur and perhaps never return. That is because although Harry was born with some special traits that support an entrepreneurial career, he wasn’t made and therefore the road ended for him pretty quickly.

At the end of the day, what I am saying is this:

A GREAT entrepreneur – the ones we read about and aspire to become – is born and not made. BUT, there is hope for the rest of us. If we are born with some (not all) of the same personality traits and abilities that a GREAT entrepreneur has, we can be made. Our parents, our childhood friends, our financial situation, our opportunity level (think 3rd world country vs. USA), our risk tolerance, the spouse we pick and a variety of other factors now come into play. Have you ever heard an entrepreneur talk about luck as one of their major success factors? These entrepreneurs are probably the ones like you and I and they know it.  Some or all of the “made” factors were present and it helped them greatly, but deep down, a lot of them know and give credit to the fact that they were lucky. They aren’t simply being humble (a nice trait in a successful entrepreneur), they know that they could have ended up somewhere totally different if a few things in their lives had gone differently.

Unless you are one of the few who really are born to be super-entrepreneurs, then join the herd with the rest of us. Make the best of your surroundings. Do your damnedst to give your kids as many “made” advantages (a blog for another time) as you can. And don’t rest on your laurels! There is nothing wrong with being Harry at the car wash – but wouldn’t you just assume own 450 of them instead of 5? C’mon, you are going to be washing cars anyway – might as well wash a lot!

My question for my readers is what do you think? Born or made?

Tags: , ,

10 Comments to “Are Entrepreneurs Made Or Born?”

  1. Andre Charoo says:

    I think that entrepreneurs are born.

    However, for us aspiring entrepreneurs who would love to make it as big as Steve Jobs and the likes, should appreciate more than the fact that they were just born that way, and thus, the reason they achieved great success. But rather, we should appreciate other factors that we don’t usually hear about and recognize that they are major influences — such as their culture, their family, their generation, their birthplace, their birth date, and even the idiosyncratic experiences of their upbringing.

    Malcolm Gladwell goes into these much more complex reasons behind great successes in his book Outliers, that I encourage anyone interested in this topic, to read. It definitely gave me a new found appreciation for extraordinary successes like Bill Gates, and even the Beatles.

    According to Malcolm Gladwell, it matters what year you were born if you want to be a Silicon Valley billionaire. He mentions, “The perfect age to be in 1975 was in your twenties.” Bill Gates was born in 1955, Steve Jobs was born in 1955, Eric Schmidt was born in 1955, Vinod Khosla was born in 1955. Yes, they were born entrepreneurs, but, they also happened to be in their twenties to capture the dawn of the personal computer age.

    So, sometimes, yes, you are born an entrepreneur, but go further and ask, when were you born?

  2. wihg says:

    thanks for share!

  3. Mike says:

    Neither!
    Here’s my theory: There are lots of people trying to succeed in business. They make completely random decisions in a constantly shifting environment. Some of them succeed. We call these people “successful entrepreneurs”.
    This is the same algorithm that drives evolution in the natural world (e.g. antibiotic resistance in bacteria – even though there are no clever bacteria!)
    This is why when other firms or public bodies spend shed-loads of money on recruiting and retaining “successful entrepreneurs”, those individuals turn out to be a complete waste of money.

  4. #HITBCN says:

    I think it is a combination of “made and born” but we will have the opportunity to test it at the Global Entrepreneurship Competition on June 19th in Barcelona.
    It is the first competition which will have the 25 finalists from different countries together.
    Read more and rate the finalists @HITBCN blog http://blog.hitbarcelona.com/

  5. Danny Jackson says:

    I look at entrepreneurs like NBA basketball players. Some guys are just born to play hoops. They are just physically gifted and “freak” athletes. Guys like LeBron, Kobe, Shaq, Jordan were born to play hoops and to be GEAT players. These players still had to work to perfect their skills but they were also born with athleticism that few other humans are blessed with…instant competitive advantage. On the opposite end of the spectrum you have John Stockton and Steve Nash (honestly, not trying to pick on the poor whites guys in the NBA…this is just how it played out). These two guys are FAR inferior athletically. They were born with some natural ability but they mostly became great because of passion and work ethic. They will never be on the same level as the LeBrons of the world but because of their passion and work ethic they will still be able to do amazing things and find success. So, I completely agree with the “entrepreneurs are born and made theory” in the post.
    Great post. I always love to hear the opinions of other when I comes to this topic. Love the blog too.

  6. The “Nature / Nurture” argument is always a central point of my entrepreneurial classes, especially among undergraduates.

    I wrote a blog entry that explores this issue and which generated a fair amount of feedback (most of it positive…).

    You can check it out at: http://www.infochachkie.com/ar.....repreneur/

  7. I’m a bit late tuning in here, but been thinking about this issue a lot. I know you have achieved a great amount, so it is will all due respect that I disagree here. I find myself skeptical of the ‘Born’ argument because it seems many of us use that mentality to excuse ourselves from not having as huge a success. It’s an easy way to explain why others are more successful, and I think it both takes credit away from others’ hard work and also encourages people to not take full responsibility for their own lives.

    I actually think we are all entrepreneurs by default, but that this instinct is gradually destroyed in most people through (1) criticism, (2) development of fears, and (3) overuse of the word can’t. Just wrote a little article on the topic and would be very interested in your thoughts if you have a chance to read – http://startupcafe.co.uk/2009/.....destroyed/

    Anyways, thanks for your writings here, will keep checking in =) @Jesso52

  8. okello says:

    i am starting a course with entrepreneurship as one of it course thanks to your website i have learnt alot on born or made arguments

  9. Eric says:

    Interesting piece in the new New Yorker by Gladwell about how the super entrepreneurs are actually quite cautious, and not the maverick/outlaws they are widely believed to be.

  10. Jason Webb says:

    Thanks for the article. I am a young finance professional myself who recently launched a fund in Utah and I love to read about others who did the same and made it to the top. Hope to be there someday.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree